The maker of a Welch-brand fruit snack filed a false promoting criticism towards its competitor, New Cibo Vita, for allegedly promoting a copycat of the corporate’s fruit and yogurt snack.
Takeaway: In late 2024, the Welch model was embroiled in a special advertising and marketing combat, this time with Basic Mills, over whether or not producers ought to be held answerable for substantiating claims made by third events on retail web sites and in reposts. PIM Manufacturers, the maker of Welch’s fruit snacks, took its combat over product critiques to the Higher Enterprise Bureau and received a willpower that Basic Mills couldn’t substantiate a number of the claims made within the posts.
Courtroom: U.S. District Courtroom for the District of New Jersey
Case Sort: False promoting
Trade: Meals, beverage, and tobacco
Attorneys: PIM is represented by David R. King of Herrick Feinstein. Additionally representing the plaintiff are Danny M. Awdeh, Patrick J. Rodgers, Maxime I. Jarquin and Morgan E. Smith of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, and Jonathan Z. King of Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman. Counsel has not but entered an look for New Cibo Vita.
Legal responsibility Arguments: PIM alleged that New Cibo Vita got down to compete head-to-head with Welch’s Fruit ‘n Yogurt Snacks by introducing a copycat yogurt-covered fruit product referred to as Nature’s Backyard Probiotic Yoggies Snack Packs. Nonetheless, PIM alleged that New Cibo Vita tried to get an unfair benefit by copying the design of Welch’s snack. The criticism additional alleged that the defendant employed false and deceptive advertising and marketing claims on the well being advantages of their snacks. PIM mentioned that they’ve verified that lots of the claims made by the defendant are false.
PIM mentioned that it could welcome truthful competitors, however mentioned that what New Cibo Vita is doing strayed from its authorized obligations in what it referred to as a “brazen try” to seize market share by “lies and deception.”
Damages Arguments: The 2-count criticism alleged false and deceptive promoting below the Lanham Act, and for unfair competitors below New Jersey frequent legislation.
PIM sought a court docket order on New Cibo Vita’s well being claims, declaring that they’re false and deceptive below federal and New Jersey frequent legislation. The criticism additionally requested for an order to stop the defendant from making future statements on the well being advantages, probiotic content material, or ingredient claims, together with in advertising and marketing supplies. PIM requested the court docket for an order requiring New Cibo Vita to supply a file of earnings gained from the alleged conduct in addition to treble damages, legal professional prices, and charges, amongst different requests.
What the legal professionals are saying: King declined to touch upon the case. A request for remark despatched to New Cibo Vita was not instantly returned.
Radar scan: In accordance with Legislation.com Radar, PIM Manufacturers can also be going through a false promoting criticism filed this month in New York Supreme Courtroom for Kings County. The category motion criticism alleged that Welch’s Slice Fruit On The Go model strawberry bars use a photograph that misleads shoppers into pondering the product incorporates extra strawberries than it really does.
Caption: PIM Manufacturers v. New Cibo Vita
Choose: Choose Michael E. Farbiarz
This motion was surfaced by Legislation.com Radar, which delivers real-time alerting on new litigation throughout greater than 2,600 state and federal courts. Click on right here to get began and be first to behave on alternatives in your area, follow space or consumer sector.
