I Tried 8 Greatest Video Conferencing Software program: Who Wins?

It began with a single, painfully awkward assembly.

You realize the sort I’m speaking about—half the attendees couldn’t be part of as a result of the hyperlink didn’t work, somebody’s audio stored chopping out, and the display screen share? Let’s simply say it wasn’t sharing a lot. That day, I discovered myself pondering: there’s obtained to be a greater method.

All of us need the identical factor from video conferencing: crystal clear audio, easy video, and options that don’t make us really feel like we’re wrestling with expertise mid-meeting.

As somebody who spends most of their day bouncing between digital conferences—group check-ins, displays, and even the occasional brainstorming periods—I noticed I’d been settling for “ok” video conferencing instruments. 

I made a decision it was time for a change. 

I began testing among the greatest video conferencing software program on G2, from the heavyweights everybody is aware of to the underdogs flying underneath the radar. Every device had its personal persona. Some have been smooth and complicated, constructed for large-scale company conferences. Others have been light-weight and user-friendly, good for small groups or informal chats. And anything? It by no means made the lower.

Whether or not you’re right here since you’re pissed off together with your present setup otherwise you’re merely curious to see what else is on the market, you’re in the best place. I’ve completed the arduous work, so that you don’t should. Let’s discover the most effective video conferencing instruments and discover the one to make your subsequent assembly seamless, productive, and possibly even enjoyable.

8 greatest video conferencing software program I examined (and liked)

Once I first began exploring video conferencing companies, I assumed it was only a fancy solution to make video calls. However the extra I used these instruments, the extra I noticed they’re a lot greater than that. The perfect video conferencing software program and platforms are designed to bridge the hole between folks, irrespective of the place they’re, by making a digital area for communication and collaboration.

For me, it’s like having a digital assembly room in my pocket—one which lets me not solely see and listen to others but additionally work collectively in actual time. It’s the place concepts are shared, choices are made, and relationships are constructed, whether or not you’re working a enterprise assembly, educating a category, or simply catching up with family members.

However right here’s the factor: the most effective video conferencing software program doesn’t simply join you; it makes the expertise easy and pleasing. That’s what units a very nice platform aside. It’s not nearly video and audio—it’s about how effectively it helps how we work together, collaborate, and get issues completed.

What makes the most effective video conferencing software program? My guidelines

Once I got down to discover the most effective video conferencing software program, I noticed it wasn’t nearly ticking containers on a function listing. The perfect instruments excel in a number of key areas that straight influence how we talk and collaborate on-line. Right here’s what I appeared for and why every issue issues.

• Collaboration: Past primary display screen sharing, I appeared for instruments that supplied breakout rooms, real-time whiteboards, and dwell polls to boost interplay. Options like dwell transcription, closed captions, and translation instruments have been nice to have, particularly when collaborating with worldwide groups. I used to be significantly impressed by platforms built-in with productiveness apps, permitting me to share recordsdata, handle duties, or co-edit paperwork straight throughout the assembly.
• Scalability and adaptability: Whether or not it’s an informal one-on-one or a webinar with hundreds of members, the software program must scale. Customizable assembly layouts, participant administration choices, and compatibility with totally different gadgets—from cellphones to a whole convention room programs—proved invaluable. Platforms that would develop with my wants, providing versatile upgrades and add-ons, scored further factors.
• Ease of use: A device can have all of the options on the earth, but when it’s complicated to make use of, it’s not price it. One-click entry by way of shared hyperlinks, browser-based choices (no downloads required), and seamless integration with instruments like Google Calendar or Outlook made an enormous distinction. I discovered that intuitive layouts, clear menus, and clear directions have been important for retaining issues stress-free.
• Reliability: I examined these instruments on every little thing from quick workplace Wi-Fi to much less dependable espresso store connections. The perfect platforms constantly delivered clear audio and easy video, even when bandwidth was restricted. Many use an adaptive streaming expertise that adjusts video high quality in actual time to keep away from lag or glitches. I additionally appreciated platforms with fast restoration programs for dropped calls, guaranteeing minimal disruption.
• Privateness and safety: Safety isn’t only a bonus—it’s a necessity. I appeared for platforms prioritizing consumer security with options like end-to-end encryption, assembly passwords, and ready rooms to manage who will get in. As somebody who typically handles delicate discussions, I really feel these safety measures present peace of thoughts.
• Worth for cash: Value issues, however it’s not nearly how a lot a device prices—it’s about what you get in your cash. I discovered that a number of free tiers supplied spectacular performance, together with limitless calls and important collaboration instruments. Nevertheless, paid plans delivered extra superior options like analytics, admin controls, and better participant limits, which have been definitely worth the funding for bigger groups or advanced initiatives. 

After testing 20+ options in opposition to these elements, I lastly have my high 8 video conferencing instruments that stood out as strong, dependable, and scalable.

The listing beneath incorporates real consumer evaluations from the most effective video conferencing software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Present on-line video and audio communication between two or extra events
• Permit video convention hosts to change specs and invite visitors to conferences
• Provide options like display screen sharing and chat inside particular person conferences
• Provide recording capabilities for future references or displays

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations might have been edited for readability.  

Google Meet is a type of video conferencing instruments that quietly will get the job completed with out further fluff. I’ve used it for every little thing from consumer calls to informal catch-ups with colleagues, and what stood out to me essentially the most was how effortlessly it integrates into my each day workflow. 

Because it’s a part of the Google Workspace ecosystem, scheduling a gathering is as straightforward as sending a calendar invite—no separate apps, no further downloads, only a easy hyperlink that pops proper into my inbox or Google Calendar. It’s virtually too handy.

Supply

I spent fairly a little bit of time testing Google Meet in numerous eventualities—group brainstorms, digital workshops, and even a number of massive webinars. The video and audio high quality remained fairly strong all through, even after I had a number of members with various web speeds. 

I significantly preferred the dwell captioning function, which transcribes conversations in actual time. It is not solely surprisingly correct but additionally tremendous useful when coping with accents or background noise. Talking of noise, Meet’s AI-powered noise cancellation did a powerful job of chopping out distractions—goodbye, development noise and barking canines!

One other cool factor I found is how effectively it integrates with different Google apps. I may share Google Docs, Sheets, or Slides straight throughout the assembly, making it straightforward to collaborate with out awkward screen-sharing struggles. Plus, it syncs completely with Google Drive, so recordings and transcripts (when you have a paid plan) are saved robotically with out me lifting a finger.

Whereas the free model is superb for primary calls, I rapidly realized that among the options I actually needed—like recording and breakout rooms—have been locked behind a paywall. The minimalist interface is nice for simplicity, however I typically wished for extra customization choices, like digital backgrounds that didn’t make me appear to be I used to be floating in area. 

Plus, for those who’re working with members outdoors the Google ecosystem, getting them onboard can typically really feel like a hurdle, primarily in the event that they’re not used to Chrome-based instruments.

What I dislike about Google Meet:

• Whereas I recognize the clear design, it feels a bit too primary. There aren’t many structure choices, enjoyable digital backgrounds, or branding options that would make conferences extra partaking.
• I rapidly realized that I might want a paid plan to report conferences, arrange breakout rooms, or use superior host controls. It’s nice for fast calls however not splendid for extra advanced digital occasions until you are prepared to pay.

What G2 customers dislike about Google Meet:

“I personally suppose there’s a want to enhance the structure of the assembly if many individuals are current directly. Throughout our conferences or any enjoyable exercise, there are often greater than 40 brokers current directly, but when we attempt to take a screenshot of all the current of us, Google Meet reveals round 30 of us directly on a display screen. We are able to attempt to enhance the potential of displaying extra of us on a display screen concurrently.”

– Google Meet Assessment, Sunil S.

Once I first began utilizing Microsoft Groups, I rapidly concluded that it’s not nearly conferences; it’s about creating a totally built-in digital workspace the place every little thing occurs in a single place. From video calls to doc collaboration, chat, and job administration, it goals to be the all-in-one answer for contemporary professionals. 

One of many first issues I examined was how effectively it dealt with conferences in numerous settings—one-on-one calls, group stand-ups, or webinars. The video and audio high quality have been strong, however I did discover that efficiency dipped barely when a number of members had their cameras on in HD, particularly on lower-end gadgets. 

Supply

What stood out to me essentially the most was the Collectively Mode, which locations all attendees in a shared digital background, like a classroom or auditorium. This function made conferences really feel extra partaking and fewer fatiguing than staring on the typical grid of floating faces.

Groups actually shine due to its deep integration with Microsoft 365. Throughout conferences, I may simply share and edit Phrase paperwork, PowerPoint slides, and Excel sheets with out juggling a number of apps or tabs. This was particularly helpful in collaborative conferences, the place everybody wanted to make fast edits in actual time. 

One other standout function is the flexibility to report conferences and retailer them straight in OneDrive or SharePoint, making it straightforward to refer again to key discussions with out manually saving recordsdata elsewhere.

Nevertheless, establishing and navigating by way of Groups can really feel daunting for those who’re new to it. The interface is filled with choices, and discovering particular options—particularly throughout dwell conferences—usually requires too many clicks. Notifications additionally turned overwhelming, with fixed pings from chat messages, channel updates, and assembly reminders, making it essential to fine-tune my notification settings to keep away from distractions. 

Whereas the platform works fantastically throughout the Microsoft ecosystem, I discovered that inviting exterior members, particularly these with out Microsoft accounts, may typically result in pointless friction with entry permissions and compatibility points.

One other disadvantage I seen was how resource-intensive Groups could be. When internet hosting bigger conferences with display screen sharing, chat exercise, and doc collaboration all working concurrently, I skilled occasional lag and slowdowns, significantly on older gadgets.

What I dislike about Microsoft Groups:

• In contrast to some less complicated video conferencing instruments, I discovered Groups’ interface dense with a number of tabs, menus, and options. It usually took too many clicks to entry primary assembly controls.
• It was a trouble to ask exterior customers, particularly these with out Microsoft accounts, which frequently led to permission points, requiring me to take further steps to grant entry and troubleshoot.

What G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Groups:

“I’ve confronted some efficiency challenges. Groups are likely to run slower on much less highly effective gadgets. Managing and organizing recordsdata shared inside channels or chats can even turn into more and more tough as the amount grows. Moreover, the search performance has limitations, making it difficult to find particular content material inside chats.”

– Microsoft Groups Assessment, Ashrith S.

Webex Suite stunned me essentially the most. It’s prefer it took the normal video conferencing expertise and upgraded it with a mix of premium options and enterprise-level reliability. 

It’s not only a device for conferences—it’s a whole platform designed for seamless collaboration, with video calls, messaging, webinars, and even calling wrapped into one cohesive bundle.

The assembly high quality instantly stood out for me. The audio readability was top-notch, even when members had less-than-stellar web connections. The built-in adaptive video decision adjusted easily with out interrupting the circulation of the assembly—an enormous plus when some attendees have been dialing in from less-than-ideal setups.

I additionally experimented with its real-time translation function, which might translate over 100 languages throughout dwell conferences. It felt like having a private interpreter on standby and was extremely helpful for world groups.

Webex Suite’s AI-powered options additionally caught my consideration. From Individuals Insights, which supplies you a snapshot of who you’re assembly with, to gesture recognition (sure, it picks up whenever you give a thumbs-up or clap), the device feels prefer it’s designed to maintain interactions energetic and intuitive. Let’s speak about its noise-cancellation expertise. I examined it in a busy café, and the opposite members swore they might hear solely my voice, not the espresso machine within the background.

One function that really elevated the expertise was the whiteboarding device. It’s built-in straight into the platform and lets members collaborate visually in actual time. No must open one other app or share your display screen awkwardly—it’s all proper there. Plus, integrating instruments like Slack and Microsoft Groups ensures it suits seamlessly into totally different workflows.

Nevertheless, whereas Webex delivers lots, it’s not with out its challenges. The consumer interface feels a bit advanced, particularly for first-time customers. There are such a lot of choices buried in menus that it may be straightforward to really feel misplaced for those who’re simply making an attempt to arrange a fast name. I additionally bumped into occasional compatibility points when members have been utilizing older {hardware} or slower web connections, which led to lag and efficiency hiccups.

One other draw back? The pricing. Webex isn’t essentially the most budget-friendly possibility on the market, particularly for small companies or solo professionals. Lots of the superior options, like in depth webinar capabilities and deep analytics, are locked behind higher-tier plans, making it a troublesome promote for smaller groups that don’t want enterprise-level instruments.

What I dislike about Webex Suite:

• In a session with over 100 members, I seen slight delays in audio and video synchronization, significantly when utilizing interactive options like polls or whiteboards.
• A few of Webex’s standout options, like real-time translation or whiteboarding, aren’t instantly apparent. I needed to dig by way of tutorials and guides to determine use them successfully.

What G2 customers dislike about Webex Suite:

“I get pissed off with the occasional efficiency issues, particularly when the connection turns into unstable throughout busy occasions. Additionally, some options really feel difficult and may want further steering or coaching for brand spanking new customers to profit from them.”

– Webex Suite Assessment, Kunal S.

Zoom Office is just like the dependable workhorse of video conferencing—it’s in all places, and for good cause. Whether or not you’re leaping into a fast one-on-one, working a big webinar, or collaborating with a worldwide group, Zoom has constructed a popularity for being quick, intuitive, and rock-solid. 

Once I began utilizing Zoom Office, I used to be curious to see if it lived as much as the hype, and I’ve to say—it delivers on most fronts, however there are nonetheless a number of areas the place it may enhance.

What actually caught my consideration throughout testing was Zoom’s AI-powered assistant, a surprisingly vibrant addition that makes conferences really feel extra productive and fewer chaotic. This AI assistant can generate assembly summaries, spotlight key dialogue factors, and even recommend follow-up actions—all with out me needing to take fixed notes.

I examined this function throughout a very fast-paced brainstorming session, and the recap it offered afterward was impressively correct. It captured motion gadgets and summarized the dialog so effectively that I may immediately share it with my group, saving us all priceless time.

One other helpful facet was the AI-driven transcription and translation, which works in actual time. Whether or not I used to be assembly with worldwide colleagues or wanted an correct textual content model of the dialogue, the assistant stepped in and offered dependable transcriptions throughout a number of languages. It’s a wonderful function for distant groups working throughout totally different time zones and languages.

I examined Zoom’s assembly options in numerous eventualities—group stand-ups, consumer displays, and even a big webinar with breakout rooms. The video high quality was wonderful, even in high-resolution mode, and the audio readability remained secure with minimal lag, even when members have been in numerous time zones with various community speeds. 

I additionally experimented with Zoom’s Good Gallery, which makes use of AI to create particular person video feeds for members in shared areas—good for hybrid work setups the place a number of folks could be becoming a member of from the identical convention name room.

One other standout function was the digital backgrounds and touch-up filters, that are surprisingly good. Whether or not I wanted to blur my messy background or improve my look for an vital consumer name, the customization choices have been strong and polished.

Nevertheless, Zoom’s free model has a time restrict that may be irritating for longer conferences. Whereas upgrading to a paid plan unlocks extra options, the prices can add up rapidly—particularly for small companies. I additionally discovered that Zoom’s efficiency could be resource-heavy, with my CPU utilization spiking throughout bigger conferences with display screen sharing and HD video enabled.

Moreover, whereas Zoom is understood for its ease of use, the variety of settings accessible can typically really feel overwhelming. It took me some time to completely discover superior options like webinar registration administration, analytics, and third-party integrations, which, whereas highly effective, aren’t all the time essentially the most intuitive to navigate.

What I dislike about Zoom Office:

• In contrast to some opponents, Zoom doesn’t supply a lot offline performance past primary recording playback. I all the time wanted a secure connection to profit from the platform.
• When sharing a number of screens or switching between functions, I skilled occasional delays and minor glitches, which may very well be irritating throughout fast-paced displays.

What G2 customers dislike about Zoom Office:

“Zoom can typically be resource-heavy, particularly on older gadgets, which causes occasional lag or crashes. Moreover, the security measures—although improved—require a bit of additional setup to make sure all conferences are totally protected. General, Zoom Office is a superb answer for enhancing communication and collaboration, permitting us to remain related and productive irrespective of the place we’re.”

– Zoom Office Assessment, Matt C. 

Slack has all the time been often known as the go-to messaging app for groups, however with its current upgrades, it is evolving right into a full-fledged collaboration hub—together with video conferencing, huddles, and deep integrations with different office instruments. 

Once I began utilizing Slack for video calls and group check-ins, I puzzled if it may substitute conventional video conferencing platforms or be higher suited as a supplementary device. Spoiler alert: it’s obtained some spectacular options, however it’s not with out its quirks.

Supply

Some of the fascinating elements of Slack is its Huddles function, which affords an informal, audio-first solution to join with colleagues immediately—virtually like dropping by their desks in a digital workplace. I discovered this function nice for spontaneous brainstorming periods or fast alignment chats with out the formality of scheduling a full-fledged assembly. 

The transition from chat to voice (and even light-weight video sharing) is seamless, making it a really perfect device for distant groups who wish to hold communication flowing with out friction.

Once I put Slack’s video conferencing function to the take a look at, I used to be impressed by how effectively it built-in with the remainder of the platform. I may pull up paperwork, share screens, and even use emoji reactions—all with out having to go away the dialog thread. The screen-sharing expertise was exceptionally easy, with choices to let members annotate straight on shared content material, which was splendid for real-time collaboration.

One other main win? Deep integrations with different productiveness instruments. Whether or not it was Google Drive, Zoom, or Asana, Slack made it extremely straightforward to tug in recordsdata, observe duties, and even automate workflows with Slack bots. The built-in AI assistant additionally helped floor vital messages and reminders, decreasing the time I spent looking for issues buried in countless chat threads.

Nevertheless, Slack’s video capabilities nonetheless really feel like an add-on quite than a core power. Whereas it’s good for fast group check-ins and one-on-one conferences, I discovered that bigger group conferences lacked among the construction and polish supplied by devoted video conferencing instruments. 

Managing vital calls (10+ folks) can get chaotic with out options like breakout rooms or superior host controls. Additionally, the video high quality tends to fluctuate relying on community stability, and the platform doesn’t supply the identical adaptive decision management as opponents like Zoom or Webex.

What I dislike about Slack:

• Slack lacks superior options like breakout rooms, ready rooms, and participant administration, which I get in a devoted video conferencing device.
• In contrast to different conferencing instruments, Slack doesn’t supply built-in recording for video calls, which implies I needed to depend on third-party integrations to avoid wasting discussions for later reference.

What G2 customers dislike about Slack:

“I am unable to say that I dislike it, however the price of plans went up just lately. I seen that the cell app model skilled lagging. Compared to different messaging software program, the standard of video calls ought to be improved when talking with purchasers.”

– Slack Assessment, Krenil B.

Skype is the OG video conferencing device. It has been round eternally, and for me, it was my first introduction to on-line video calls. Over time, it has developed from a easy call-and-chat device right into a extra feature-rich communication platform that’s nonetheless extensively used for each private {and professional} interactions. 

Naturally, I needed to see if Skype may nonetheless compete in in the present day’s crowded video-conferencing panorama, and my expertise was a mixture of nostalgia and discovery.

I discovered Skype fairly accessible and cross-platform-friendly. Whether or not I used to be utilizing a laptop computer, cell phone, or perhaps a good TV, Skype labored seamlessly throughout gadgets. The set up course of was fast, and signing in with a Microsoft account was a breeze—primarily for those who already use different Microsoft companies. I examined calls throughout totally different gadgets, and the synchronization was spot on, making it straightforward to change between gadgets mid-call.

One in every of Skype’s standout options is its name high quality, which stays impressively secure even on slower connections. Due to Skype’s adaptive bandwidth expertise, video and audio high quality alter robotically based mostly on web circumstances, which was a reduction after I was working from a café with spotty Wi-Fi. The noise suppression function additionally labored surprisingly effectively, retaining background sounds to a minimal and guaranteeing my voice was evident all through.

Skype’s screen-sharing capabilities have been additionally strong. I may current slides and stroll by way of paperwork with none vital hiccups. Nevertheless, in comparison with trendy instruments like Zoom or Groups, Skype lacks some finesse in collaborative options—there’s no interactive annotation or whiteboarding, which I missed when engaged on brainstorming periods with my group.

The interface additionally feels outdated, and whereas it’s purposeful, it doesn’t have the polished, trendy look of its opponents. Navigating by way of contacts and settings felt a bit clunky, and discovering sure options (like name scheduling) wasn’t as intuitive as I’d hoped. The dearth of strong assembly administration options—resembling breakout rooms, host controls, and participant analytics—makes Skype extra fitted to informal one-on-one calls quite than massive, structured conferences.

What I dislike about Skype:

• I didn’t get pleasure from utilizing Skype’s design and interface. It seems to be and feels a bit clunky and old style, and it hasn’t developed a lot lately.
• Skype tends to eat plenty of system assets, particularly when video is enabled for prolonged intervals. My laptop computer followers kicked in additional usually than I’d like.

What G2 customers dislike about Skype:

“Generally, Skype feels a bit old-school. Video high quality could be glitchy, and the app could be complicated to navigate at occasions.”

– Skype Assessment, Omar S.

BlueJeans Conferences may not be the primary title that involves thoughts whenever you consider video conferencing, however after diving into it, I discovered that it affords some spectacular options that set it other than the competitors. 

Owned by Verizon, BlueJeans focuses on high-definition video and enterprise-grade safety, making it a strong alternative for companies that want dependable and safe communication.

When testing BlueJeans, I seen its distinctive audio and video high quality. In contrast to some platforms that robotically downgrade high quality based mostly on bandwidth, BlueJeans prioritizes crisp visuals and Dolby Voice audio expertise, which I discovered delivered a noticeably extra prosperous, extra immersive sound expertise. Whether or not I used to be in a quiet dwelling workplace or a loud café, background noise was effectively managed, and the voices got here by way of crystal clear with out the standard “tin can” impact.

One other standout function is Good Conferences, an AI-powered device that enhances productiveness by providing computerized highlights, motion gadgets, and clever assembly recaps. I examined this by recording a brainstorming session, and the AI did a surprisingly good job figuring out key moments and making a concise assembly abstract I may share with my group. This function is improbable for groups that continuously maintain technique periods and wish fast recaps with out handbook note-taking.

Display screen sharing on BlueJeans was one other spotlight for me. It’s optimized for high-resolution content material, so after I shared detailed displays and movies, they appeared sharp with minimal lag. I additionally preferred the flexibility to share particular functions quite than my complete display screen, which added an additional layer of privateness.

Nevertheless, BlueJeans is not good. Whereas it excels in efficiency and safety, the consumer interface feels a bit outdated, and I discovered navigating the settings to be much less intuitive than opponents. Some primary actions—like managing breakout rooms or switching audio sources—required extra clicks than I anticipated, which slowed issues down throughout dwell conferences.

I additionally discovered that whereas BlueJeans integrates with main platforms like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, the ecosystem of third-party integrations isn’t as in depth as Zoom or Groups. For those who depend on instruments like Slack, Trello, or CRM platforms, you could discover BlueJeans a bit restricted by way of native integrations.

What I dislike about BlueJeans Conferences:

• Whereas the desktop app runs easily, I discovered the net model to be barely extra restricted by way of options and total efficiency, particularly when managing bigger conferences.
• BlueJeans doesn’t supply native digital backgrounds or touch-up options, which generally is a draw back for customers like me who need extra video personalization.

What G2 customers dislike about BlueJeans Conferences:

“I used to be going through challenges whereas connecting with the client help group because the wait time was very lengthy to resolve my points. So they need to enhance the help group to reply rapidly to clients’ points.”

– BlueJeans Assembly Assessment, Rangarajan H.

GoTo Assembly has been a staple within the video conferencing world for years. It’s recognized for its reliability and ease, particularly for companies that want a no-frills, reliable assembly answer. Once I began utilizing GoTo Assembly, I used to be desperate to see if it may stand as much as newer opponents with extra feature-packed choices. 

Whereas it doesn’t have all of the flashy bells and whistles, it does ship a strong, skilled assembly expertise, specializing in high-quality audio, robust safety, and user-friendly controls.

One of many first issues I seen was how light-weight and quick the platform is. In contrast to some video conferencing instruments that may really feel heavy and sluggish, GoTo Assembly runs easily even on lower-end gadgets, which makes it nice for group members who may not have the newest {hardware}. I examined it on each desktop and cell, and the expertise was constant, with minimal lag or connectivity points.

The audio high quality stood out as one among GoTo Assembly’s strongest options. Powered by their proprietary noise suppression expertise, the calls have been clear, with little to no background noise interference, even after I was in a loud atmosphere. 

I discovered the Name Me function particularly helpful—it robotically dials members’ telephones when the assembly begins, eradicating the necessity to fumble with dial-in numbers and PINs.

One other function I appreciated was the drawing instruments and shared keyboard/mouse management, which made collaboration a lot smoother throughout displays and distant troubleshooting periods. In contrast to different platforms the place display screen sharing could be clunky, GoTo Assembly stored it delicate and responsive, even after I shared high-resolution content material.

Nevertheless, I did discover that GoTo Assembly’s interface feels slightly outdated. Whereas purposeful, the structure lacks the trendy contact and intuitive design that might make navigation extra seamless. There’s a studying curve, particularly when establishing extra superior options like assembly scheduling or recording settings.

The platform additionally lacks engagement instruments like polls, reactions, or breakout rooms, making conferences really feel a bit dry—particularly for bigger, extra interactive periods. For those who’re planning a webinar or a brainstorming session that requires viewers participation, GoTo Assembly may not be the only option.

What I dislike about GoTo Assembly:

• I missed the comfort of breakout rooms. This device isn’t splendid for internet hosting workshops or group discussions, which is a draw back in comparison with opponents.
• I didn’t discover adequate personalization choices for video conferences. There are not any digital backgrounds or touch-up filters.

What G2 customers dislike about GoTo Assembly:

“The consumer interface, which some discover much less intuitive than different platforms. One other problem could be occasional lag or technical points throughout bigger conferences, which could disrupt communication. Some customers additionally point out that options like display screen sharing or file uploads may very well be smoother, and the cell app doesn’t all the time ship the identical expertise because the desktop model. Lastly, the pricing may really feel steep for smaller groups who do not make the most of all of the options.”

– GoTo Assembly Assessment, Ana B.

Discover the thrilling world of VR conferencing and uncover how immersive expertise can revolutionize collaboration and connection.