COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — International Points

by Anup Shah
This web page Created Saturday, January 24, 2015

This web page: https://www.globalissues.org/article/805/cop20-lima-climate-conference.
To print all info (e.g. expanded aspect notes, reveals different hyperlinks), use the print model:

On this web page:

Introduction
Assembly final result
Mainstream media reporting
In context: widespread however differentiated obligations
Extra info
Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, also called the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to high

Assembly final result

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse fuel emissions. Referred to as the Lima Accord, this treaty will not be legally binding and nations shouldn’t have to specify how a lot they may in the reduction of, as an alternative agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it appeared like a profitable final result, others had been disillusioned, resembling poor nations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who had been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and injury commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful features of the assembly final result, noting

The brand new settlement doesn’t replicate the urgency of the local weather disaster
Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
Least developed and susceptible nations neglected within the chilly
Divestment (from fossil gasoline reliance) is extra vital than ever
International momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In attempting to place a optimistic spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, In the long run, a worldwide local weather treaty is only one instrument to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to come back from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s nations comes collectively to debate this disaster and individuals are placing in monumental efforts to verify Paris [the next global meeting] received’t be like Copenhagen which was filled with disappointments regardless of massive guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s International Local weather and Power Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly final result saying that political expediency received over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to clarify how they may ship the long-promised US$100 billion per yr in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of essentially the most susceptible nations, they utterly eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and injury’.

Again to high

Mainstream media reporting

As with nearly each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this international concern. The place the assembly was reported it was usually in the direction of the tip, and simply sound chew sort summaries saying all nations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a serious enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing widespread however differentiated obligations the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has usually failed to offer rationalization and context of this precept that has been an vital a part of these talks for over 2 a long time; that poor and growing nations shouldn’t bear the identical obligations because the developed ones (as a result of they don’t seem to be the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier a long time which have led to this, which is detailed far more on this web site’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in the direction of this precept might have been offered as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, relatively then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from widespread reporting. Others included points on financing, expertise assist for poorer nations, and so on. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy nations have stalled on this stuff or actively averted attempting to share expertise and so on, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is product of mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations annually, it may be straightforward to come back away with the impression that this assembly had a optimistic final result.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! reveals, there have been various vital problems with competition:

Emissions-Slicing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to high

In context: widespread however differentiated obligations

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from right now’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the primary greenhouse fuel — stays within the environment for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling essentially the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would due to this fact be totally different for these teams of nations — the widespread however differentiated obligations precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and injury has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy nations are eager to eliminate .

The years of resistance on this concern (and plenty of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the dearth of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this side, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their monumental greenhouse emissions in recent times, in comparison with the far higher quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this web site’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this web site has stated for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s finally — and disproportionately — paid for the by the growing nations. New Delhi primarily based Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Commonplace, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There is no such thing as a motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be achieved by the developed nations. They [rich nations] principally have simply stated at Lima that we aren’t going to do any greater than what we’re doing to date, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different growing nations should share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in dangerous religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Slicing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to high