COP19—Warsaw Local weather Convention — World Points

by Anup Shah
This web page Created Monday, December 02, 2013

This web page: https://www.globalissues.org/article/803/cop19-warsaw-climate-conference.
To print all info (e.g. expanded aspect notes, reveals various hyperlinks), use the print model:

On this web page:

Introduction
Assembly end result
In context: widespread however differentiated obligations
In context: Storm Haiyan
Lack of urgency
Extra info
Information tales from IPS

Introduction

November 11 – 23, 2013, Warsaw, Poland was the venue for the nineteenth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, also called the nineteenth Convention of the Events — or COP 19.

The aim of this convention was to create a loss and harm pillar of a brand new local weather treaty to be finalized in 2015. The opposite two pillars mentioned in earlier conferences are mitigation (emission reductions) and adaptation pillars.

Again to high

Assembly end result

The primary end result of the assembly was the institution of a world mechanism for a loss and harm related to local weather change impacts .

Predictably, the loss and harm facet of local weather negotiations introduced out the worst in some international locations. Some growing international locations had been going to withstand the thought of financing adaptation to local weather change, whereas others appeared to hate the thought of local weather reparations for poor international locations. A couple of years earlier, industrialized nations had made a authorized dedication to a world local weather fund. Unsurprisingly, not a lot got here of it, as Inter Press Service summarized,

In 2009 on the semi-infamous Copenhagen talks, the wealthy international locations made a cope with growing international locations, saying in impact: We’ll provide you with billions of {dollars} for adaptation, ramping as much as 100 billion {dollars} a yr by 2020, in alternate for our mitigation amounting to small CO2 cuts as a substitute of constructing the massive cuts that we should always do.

The cash to assist poor international locations adapt flowed for the primary three years however has largely dried up. Warsaw was presupposed to be the Finance COP to deliver the promised cash. That did not occur.

Nations like Germany, Switzerland and others in Europe solely managed to scrape collectively guarantees of 110 million {dollars} into the Inexperienced Local weather Fund. Growing international locations wished a assure of 70 billion a yr by 2016 however had been blocked by the U.S., Canada, Australia, Japan and others.

Stephen Lehey, South Scores Eleventh-Hour Win on Local weather Loss and Harm, Inter Press Service, November 24, 2013

It acquired to the purpose that a whole lot of representatives from numerous NGOs walked out of the negotiating rooms to protest towards developed international locations’ reluctance to decide to a loss and harm mechanism. And this was a day after the G77+China group of 133 growing international locations walked out of negotiations over the identical factor.

Wanting by means of the briefing stories from the revered NGO, the Third World Community, It appears that evidently on the floor, whereas an end result was ultimately thrashed out, there are lots of areas of weak point of adequate vagueness to fulfill everybody that contentious points which might be seemingly resolved can nonetheless be challenged and adjusted sooner or later.

Again to high

In context: widespread however differentiated obligations

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from right this moment’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the primary greenhouse fuel — stays within the environment for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling probably the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would due to this fact be totally different for these teams of nations — the widespread however differentiated obligations precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and harm has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy international locations are eager to do away with .

The years of resistance on this concern (and plenty of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the shortage of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this facet, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their huge greenhouse emissions lately, in comparison with the far larger quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this web site’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

Again to high

In context: Storm Haiyan

Storm Haiyan was the most important cyclone on file to hit land

The assembly got here on the time when the devastating Storm Haiyan had simply killed hundreds within the Philippines and affected thousands and thousands extra. It was an ominous warning of what might be extra frequent as local weather change continues to take maintain.

It was additionally an instance of how poorer nations might be affected by an issue they’ve largely not been answerable for and that whereas all of the worldwide outpouring of support and help was extremely welcome, that help for stopping and adapting to such occasions is paramount and efforts are urgently wanted to curb emission will increase.

In an emotional speech the Philippines lead negotiator for the convention, Naderev Saño, acquired a standing ovation for asserting that he’ll go on a starvation strike till a significant end result is in sight.

Again to high

Lack of urgency

Inter Press Service (IPS) famous the seeming lack of urgency given the years and years of delay and watering down of significant motion:

To have an excellent probability at staying beneath two levels C, industrialised international locations must crash their CO2 emissions 10 p.c per yr beginning in 2014, stated Kevin Anderson of the Tyndall Centre for Local weather Change Analysis on the College of Manchester.

We are able to nonetheless do two C however not the best way we’re going, Anderson stated on the sidelines of COP 19 in Warsaw. He questioned why negotiators on the within will not be reacting to the fact that it’s too late for incremental adjustments.

I’m actually surprised there is no such thing as a sense of urgency right here, he instructed IPS.

Stephen Lehey, South Scores Eleventh-Hour Win on Local weather Loss and Harm, Inter Press Service, November 24, 2013

Again to high