There’s an episode of Seinfeld the place George has intercourse with a cleansing girl on his workplace desk and when confronted responds, “Was that improper? Ought to I’ve not accomplished that?” However, since Seinfeld extra intently tracks a universe the place actions have logical penalties, George received fired and Clarence Thomas will get to plead ignorance a couple of practically five-decade-old legislation.
Thomas, who has forgotten extra holidays than you’ll ever know, has been the topic of a Senate Judiciary inquiry ever since ProPublica first recognized round half 1,000,000 in luxurious journey and items with out disclosing any of it as legally required by the Ethics in Authorities Act of 1978. Alongside the way in which, we’ve discovered about free tuition, free housing, and an RV (which could even have been free). The legislators wrote the Judicial Convention asking the Article III establishment to do its job beneath the statute and refer Thomas to the Division of Justice. Nearly two years after the actual fact, the Convention has determined to do nothing as a substitute.
In a letter from the Judicial Convention to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Secretary of the Judicial Convention Choose Robert Conrad stated that they’d determined in opposition to doing something as a result of Thomas was in all probability simply confused about methods to learn the plain which means of a legislation. A believable excuse based mostly upon his jurisprudence usually, however extremely suspect right here.
In March and April 2023, the Monetary Disclosure Committee, with the approval of the Judicial Convention, issued steerage that the non-public hospitality reward reporting exemption applies solely to meals, lodging, or leisure. The exemption, it defined, doesn’t apply to items of “transportation that substitute[] for industrial transportation,” items “prolonged for a enterprise goal,” or items “prolonged at a industrial property, e.g., a resort or restaurant, or at a property that’s usually rented out to others for a enterprise goal.” The Monetary Disclosure Committee, usually talking, doesn’t apply new steerage retroactively to beforehand filed studies.
That is the “I didn’t hear anybody say ‘Simon Says’” of excuses.
The issue with “not apply[ing] new steerage retroactively,” is that presumes there’s one thing “new” in regards to the steerage. Nobody was truly confused over the scope of this exception earlier than this. Nobody thought an exception for crashing in your faculty roommate’s sofa was the identical as “having a billionaire give your mother a home lease free.” Elena Kagan thought a fucking bagel basket from her highschool classmates put her in breach of this legislation! Everybody knew!
Extra to the purpose, when among the allegations on this matter embrace auto mortgage forgiveness shenanigans and off-the-books funds, there’s greater than a bit to recommend that Thomas knew. At the least sufficient suggestion that the case would profit from a DOJ inquiry.
“Not solely do presidents have absolute immunity from prosecution for violating the legislation, however now Supreme Courtroom justices get pleasure from immunity for law-breaking, as properly,” defined Repair the Courtroom’s Gabe Roth. “That’s as shameful as it’s opposite to the plain-text studying of the monetary disclosure legislation, which units clear tips in regards to the forms of items that should be reported — which Justice Thomas has clearly and ceaselessly violated through the years — and contains actual penalties for violations.”
Alas, the Convention defined that Thomas has made some modifications so everybody ought to simply chill.
Justice Thomas has filed amended monetary disclosure statements that tackle a number of points recognized in your letter.
“A number of” is conspicuously not “all.”
Which can sound like nitpicking, however legal professionals — particularly judges — aren’t informal with phrases like these. When he says, “a number of” he means “not all” and it could be fascinating to get extra readability on simply what it doesn’t embrace.
However even when the Convention hadn’t discovered a option to excuse Thomas as confused, the letter suggests they may have tried to keep away from their authorized obligations the quaint manner by declaring the Supreme Courtroom exempt from any penalties:
First, the Judicial Convention has by no means taken a place on whether or not its referral authority beneath 5 U.S.C. § 13106(b)—to refer judges to the Lawyer Basic for investigation into whether or not they have “willfully” violated their reporting obligations—applies to Justices of the Supreme Courtroom of the USA. The query, to be clear, just isn’t whether or not the Ethics in Authorities Act applies to the Justices of the Courtroom. It’s whether or not the Judicial Convention’s referral authority applies to the Justices. There may be motive to doubt that the Convention has any such authority. As a result of the Judicial Convention doesn’t superintend the Supreme Courtroom and since any effort to grant the Convention such authority would elevate severe constitutional questions, one would count on Congress at a minimal to state any such directive clearly.
To not get all originalist, however that is hogwash. Roth explains, “The Convention writing the justices out of a lot of the disclosure legislation can also be ahistorical, because the legislation was drafted shortly after two justices had been discovered to have accepted outdoors — and arguably unethical — earnings. ”
However, as Chief Justice Roberts defined earlier this week, it’s improper to level out that your judicial emperor wears no garments.
(Letter on the subsequent web page…)
Earlier: Clarence Thomas Has Forgotten Extra Holidays Than You’ll Ever Know
Senators Beg Merrick Garland To Do His Job And Examine Clarence Thomas
If You’ve Appreciated The Service You’ve Acquired, Think about Tipping Your Supreme Courtroom Justices!
Clarence Thomas Took EVEN MORE Free Journeys On Personal Planes That He’s Nonetheless Not Disclosed!
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Regulation and co-host of Considering Like A Lawyer. Be happy to e-mail any suggestions, questions, or feedback. Comply with him on Twitter or Bluesky if you happen to’re concerned with legislation, politics, and a wholesome dose of faculty sports activities information. Joe additionally serves as a Managing Director at RPN Govt Search.
