The Devin Nunes Defamation Juggernaut Runs Aground

Date:


800px-Cow-IMG_2050Two years in the past, California Congressman Devin Nunes wandered off from the Home of Representatives to run Donald Trump’s media firm. In that point he’s steered it to large success … ish. In the latest quarter, it reported losses of $16 million on $836,900 of earnings, and the inventory is down 70 p.c previously six months.

However Nunes’s true present is for litigation. Certainly, relating to submitting rubbish defamation fits, the person is second to none. It’s his one, true calling. He sued CNN. He sued McClatchy. He sued NBC. He sued a Twitter cow. He’s even getting Trump Media into the motion. And previously week he has euthanized one go well with in opposition to the Washington Submit and tried to resurrect one other in opposition to Esquire.

The Submit go well with concerned a November 2020 story by reporter Ellen Nakashima, and the gravamen of his grievance may be inferred from the correction which presently accompanies it:

Correction: As initially printed, this text inaccurately attributed claims that the Obama administration spied on Trump Tower to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), fairly than to President Trump. Nunes has said that he didn’t consider there had been any wiretapping of Trump Tower. This text has additionally been up to date to notice that Nunes says an incident often known as the “midnight run” happened throughout sunlight hours.

He bailed out of that Uber throughout the day, and don’t you overlook it!

Decide Carl Nichols dismissed the case in June, writing that “an affordable jury couldn’t conclude that the correction was materially false. In spite of everything, as Defendants appropriately contend, the report demonstrates that Nunes’s public statements in March 2017 after the White Home go to had ‘offered some credence to Trump’s considerations.’” After which Nunes promptly appealed to the DC Circuit.

It’s been going GREAT, as demonstrated by this letter from the Submit‘s lawyer to the clerk.

Pursuant to Circuit Rule 12(e), Appellees WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post and Ellen Nakashima (collectively, “The Post”), by their undersigned counsel, write to advise the Clerk of three errors in Appellant Devin G. Nunes’s Civil Docketing Statement (filed August 21, 2024, in Case No. 24-7107): 1. Question 3: “Case name.” The docketing statement misidentifies WP Company LLC as WP Company LLP. The correct case name for the caption is “Devin G. Nunes v. WP Company LLC.”2. Question 4: “Type of Case.” The docketing statement erroneously indicates that this appeal is an “Original Proceeding.” This appeal is not an original appellate proceeding. 3. Question 6(g): “Are any motions currently pending in trial court?” The docketing statement erroneously contains the selection “no.” One motion remains pending in trial court, as the District Court has not ruled on The Post’s sealed Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 77-2), filed on October 11, 2023.

Yesterday the events stipulated to a dismissal in that case. Presumably this resolves the unpleasantness within the excellent sealed movement.

However when God Trump closes a door, he opens a window … or tries to, anyway. And so Congressman Cowpoke hopes to get the Eighth Circuit to revive his lawsuit in opposition to Hearst for a narrative printed in Esquire in 2018 by reporter Ryan Lizza entitled Devin Nunes’s Household Farm Is Hiding a Politically Explosive Secret. The piece famous that Nunes’s household upped sticks and left California years in the past to run a dairy farm in Sibley, Iowa, the place Lizza spent a nice week being tailed by varied members of Nunes’s instant household. And it famous that the dairy business in Iowa depends closely on using undocumented immigrants.

Nunes and his household each sued for defamation, seemingly unaware that submitting a lawsuit means it’s a must to undergo discovery. And discovery proved fairly conclusively that the Nunes household farm did make use of undocumented immigrants, which is why Decide C.J. Williams, a Trump appointee, dismissed the grievance in April of 2023. Certainly Nunes’s lawyer Jesse Binnall admitted as a lot in oral argument earlier than the Eighth Circuit final week.

Courthouse Information stories:

On Wednesday, U.S. Circuit Decide Bobby Shepherd, a George W. Bush appointee, requested Nunes’ lawyer Jesse Binnall of the Binnall Regulation Group in Alexandria, Virginia, to verify an announcement within the courtroom report: “There isn’t a real dispute of fabric indisputable fact that it’s considerably true that NuStar used undocumented labor.”

Binnall acknowledged the assertion, however he added: “The phrase at situation is ‘knowingly.’ And why that’s so vital is as a result of there are federal legal guidelines that govern how one can ask any individual about their standing. If a farm would have merely gone to folks, primarily based on the language they spoke, the colour of their pores and skin, anything like that in making an attempt to get extra particular on whether or not or not that they had authorized standing — they might have been sued. They might theoretically have been prosecuted. You can’t try this.”

U.S. Circuit Chief Decide Steven Colloton, additionally a George W. Bush appointee, requested Binnall to make clear the query round unlawful hiring.

“The dispute,” Binnall replied, “is what NuStar knew and after they knew it.”

Really, the person’s First Modification jurisprudence is artwork.

Nunes v. WaPo [Circuit Docket via Court Listener]
Nunes v. WaPo [District Docket via Court Listener]
Nunes v. Lizza [District Docket via Court Listener]
Nunes v. Lizza [Circuit Docket via Court Listener]
Devin Nunes seeks revival of defamation case over Esquire article about his household farm [Courthouse News]


Liz Dye lives in Baltimore the place she produces the Regulation and Chaos substack and podcast.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular

More like this
Related