Years of market sluggishness and aggressive enlargement by massive firms imply massive offers of the previous have been possible a prelude to extra acquisitions in 2025, Intel survey outcomes and interviews recommend.
This report is obtainable solely to subscribers of Inman Intel, the information and analysis arm of Inman providing deep insights and market intelligence on the enterprise of residential actual property and proptech. Subscribe in the present day.
Fee lawsuits and battles involving the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors have dominated latest headlines. However quietly within the background, one thing else was additionally happening: Main acquisitions and mergers.
Excessive-profile examples embrace Compass shopping for Latter & Blum in April and @properties Christie’s Worldwide Actual Property in December, in addition to Howard Hanna merging with Dwelling Specialists Realty final month. These and comparable tales increase a number of questions: Will equally massive acquisitions proceed this yr? What kinds of firms will do the buying, and what sorts might be devoured up?
In different phrases, was 2024 a prelude or a postscript to the consolidation story?
TAKE THE INMAN INTEL INDEX SURVEY FOR FEBRUARY
To seek out out, Intel contacted business consultants — for each on- and off-the-record talks — and surveyed brokerage leaders in our newest Inman Intel Index survey.
The takeaway from these efforts is that quite a lot of elements are converging to probably make 2025 a banner yr for mergers and acquisitions. Put one other method, there’s probability that 2024 was the truth is only a prelude.
However on the similar time, not everyone seems to be more likely to be a victor on this story. As a substitute, massive and highly effective firms which have a observe file of succeeding in lean instances will be the ones making essentially the most headlines for M&A offers this yr.
Most brokerage leaders aren’t targeted on M&A
In January, Intel requested brokerage leaders to rank mergers and acquisitions on a scale of 1 to 5. One indicated that M&A was not on their radar, whereas 5 indicated that imminent discussions have been happening. The outcomes instructed that mergers and acquisitions should not particularly excessive on the precedence checklist for most of the practically 200 brokerage leader-respondents.
- Practically 47 % of survey respondents chosen one, that means M&A will not be on their radar. One other 12 % chosen two, equally indicating that M&A is a low precedence.
- Solely 8 % of respondents chosen 5, with one other 12 % deciding on 4 — responses indicating that M&A is a significant precedence.
- Outcomes have been comparable when Intel requested leaders about M&A in 12 months. In that case, 36 % of respondents chosen one — which once more on this query meant the subject is “not on the radar” — and one other 16 % chosen two. Solely 11 % of respondents chosen 5.
Acquisitions movement to the large firms
None of this implies, nevertheless, that mergers and acquisitions received’t be an enormous deal this yr. Actually, everybody who spoke with Intel for this story predicted vital M&A information within the coming months.
“I believe it’ll be a really energetic yr,” Chris Heller, president of OJO/movoto.com, instructed Intel in a remark that captured a broader sentiment. “I believe a whole lot of firms wish to develop and I believe we’ll see a whole lot of exercise.”
The takeaway, then, is that M&A might not be evenly distributed; en masse, acquisitions might not be on each radar, however its a subject that’s very a lot on the radar of some massive gamers.
The consultants provided a number of causes that 2025 may be energetic for M&A.
- A gradual market has put stress on smaller firms for a number of years now.
- “You’re going to see firms principally saying I don’t see a method out of this and I wish to money my chips in,” Russ Cofano, CEO of Collabra Expertise, instructed Intel.
- “Because the business goes by means of difficult instances, you are inclined to see a whole lot of consolidation,” Heller mentioned.
- Bigger firms reminiscent of Compass have managed to develop regardless of a gradual market.
- Compass, for instance, reported progress in each income and agent rely within the first three quarters of 2024.
- EXp’s agent rely progress largely remained stalled in 2024, however the firm did report income features within the first three quarters of final yr.
- “The massive firms most likely really feel like they’ve weathered the storm,” Heller mentioned. “They’re not 2025 as, ‘let’s simply get to the opposite facet.’ They’re 2025 as, ‘now now we have to develop.’”
- “With the large gamers, that is a part of their technique, they’re actively how you can develop their firms with acquisitions,” Cofano mentioned. “Versus the smaller firms that may be extra opportunistic in the best way they method an acquisition, by means of relationships at native ranges.
- Cloud-based firms reminiscent of eXp, LPT, and Actual are rising and have leaner operations than conventional brokerages. Some M&A might consequently happen as conventional operations search for entry to these enterprise fashions.
- The Actual Brokerage, for instance, reported final fall that its agent rely exploded by greater than 2,000 between July and October.
- “It’s practically inconceivable for a standard brick-and-mortar firm to out of the blue develop into cloud based mostly,” Cofano mentioned. “They virtually must kill their previous mannequin.”
- Non-public fairness firms have been sitting on the sidelines for the final a number of years.
- “Plenty of the acquisitions are going to be from non-public fairness,” Ben Kinney, co-founder of Place, which made 5 acquisitions final yr. “They’re sitting on huge buckets of money that they haven’t been capable of deploy. They’re searching for alternatives and my telephone is ringing off the hook.”
- Kinney additionally mentioned that capital markets might give more cash this yr to “sturdy firms,” placing them in a “place to gobble up the weaker ones.”
Brokers are most taken with making acquisitions
Intel additionally requested brokerage leaders who do have M&A on their radars what kinds of offers they may take into account. Most indicated they’re extra taken with gobbling up rivals than they’re in being devoured up themselves.
- A plurality of respondents, or 48 %, mentioned their brokerage buying a competitor of their market was one thing their management groups would take into account this yr.
- The second hottest response, at 38 %, pointed to their agency making an acquisition to increase into a brand new market.
- Solely a complete of 23 % indicated their management staff can be open to promoting, both with that staff staying in place or with them leaving.
The sturdy survive
Ongoing market stress means one kind of acquisition which will develop into widespread this yr will contain firms that haven’t but discovered the brand new regular.
- “On the skin they could not seem like they’re struggling, however they possible are,” Heller mentioned of some acquisition targets. “Issues aren’t enhancing on the charge they want them too.”
- “For any actual property brokerage or model, the important thing measure of success is what number of nice actual property brokers you entice and retain,” Marc King, former president of Keller Williams, instructed Intel. You develop otherwise you go backward, there is no such thing as a stasis. Thus, any firm not keen to evolve, develop and improve its worth to the native agent will possible be a goal of acquisition.”
Nonetheless, the splashiest offers may very well contain firms which can be thriving.
- “In these eventualities the businesses being acquired must see a 1+1=3 situation,” Cofano mentioned. “They’re not firms which can be essentially financially struggling or really feel like they don’t have a path ahead. However they really feel like with the acquisition, they and their brokers can do financially higher with new possession and sources and scale and all these issues {that a} bigger group can present.”
- Kinney additionally pointed to money movement optimistic firms — assume regional brokerages or title companies — as doable acquisition targets. “These firms are bought to non-public fairness companies, public firms, or different worthwhile non-public companies buying and selling on a a number of of EBITDA.”
Trickle down economics
Although Intel survey questions targeted on brokerage leaders, proptech got here up repeatedly in Intel’s conversations for this story. And the thought is that for all the difficulty the market has given brokerages, it has been at the least as dangerous for a lot of proptech companies who generate income from actual property professionals — professionals who in nowadays might have a lot much less money. The result’s that 2025 could also be a interval of winnowing for the proptech world as firms merge in an effort to outlive, or to chop losses on the eleventh hour.
In different phrases, proptech might develop into floor zero for actual property M&A in 2025.
- “There’s numerous startups that launched within the final 5 years which can be within the stage the place in the event that they’re not worthwhile they’re going to be targets,” Heller opined. “In the event that they aren’t profitable to find a house then they typically instances merge with different firms.”
- Kinney famous that in tech there could also be firms which have “dangerous product match and low income,” by which case “these firms are sometimes hearth gross sales, bought for scraps by smaller firms trying to create new income streams or enhance their very own numbers.”
- Different firms might have good merchandise, however battle with income progress. “These firms are acquired by means of a mix of money and inventory, providing founders a chance to have a much bigger win with the buying firm,” Kinney additionally mentioned. “They’re usually purchased by firms in search of to increase their buyer base or product strains.”
Methodology notes: This month’s Inman Intel Index survey was carried out Jan. 21-Feb. 4, 2025, and acquired 652 responses. All the Inman reader group was invited to take part, and a rotating, randomized collection of group members was prompted to take part by electronic mail. Customers responded to a sequence of questions associated to their self-identified nook of the true property business — together with actual property brokers, brokerage leaders, lenders and proptech entrepreneurs. Outcomes replicate the opinions of the engaged Inman group, which can not all the time match these of the broader actual property business. This survey is carried out month-to-month.
