February 13, 2025
4 min learn
Scientists React to RFK, Jr.’s Affirmation as HHS Secretary
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has expressed assist for some fields of science however has additionally declared he’d like a “break” in infectious-disease analysis. Right here’s what he would possibly do because the U.S.’s newly confirmed secretary of well being and human companies
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. now oversees the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, which he final yr known as a ‘cesspool of corruption.’
Scientists are bracing for main modifications within the path of US biomedical analysis as Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who has promoted vaccine misinformation and public-health conspiracies, features management over an unlimited swathe of science coverage.
The Senate voted at this time to substantiate Kennedy as President Donald Trump’s secretary of the Division of Well being and Human Providers, which has an annual finances of roughly US$1.7 trillion and contains the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH) — the world’s largest funder of biomedical analysis. Kennedy has embraced some fields of biomedical analysis. However he has proven hostility to others, and has rejected established science on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, the security of vaccines normally and different matters. (Kennedy informed the Senate that he helps vaccines and believes that they’ve saved lives.)
“The way forward for America as a superpower in analysis seems grim,” says Theodora Hatziioannou, a virologist on the Rockefeller College in New York Metropolis, who creates new fashions for finding out HIV ― which Kennedy has falsely recommended just isn’t the reason for AIDS. “Even on points he claims he helps, he doesn’t observe scientific proof. Selecting an individual like this to guide is like having the wolf guard the sheep.”
On supporting science journalism
When you’re having fun with this text, take into account supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you’re serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at this time.
False dichotomy
Throughout his personal presidential marketing campaign, Kennedy mentioned that he would prioritize analysis on persistent illnesses and would give infectious-disease analysis on the NIH “a break” for eight years. Talking earlier than a Senate committee in January, Kennedy asserted that persistent circumstances comparable to weight problems, diabetes, bronchial asthma and a few cancers have traditionally acquired much less consideration than infectious illnesses, however are largely accountable for rising healthcare prices. (Information from the NIH present that most cancers alone receives extra federal funding than that allotted to all infectious illnesses mixed.)
Even some researchers who may benefit from an emphasis on persistent illness are cautious. Eric Lau, a most cancers researcher on the Moffitt Most cancers Heart in Tampa, Florida, says that though it will actually be good to see extra money poured into finding out most cancers, the federal authorities ought to deal with growing funding for biomedical analysis normally.
Each he and Larry Schlesinger, a physician-scientist and chief govt of the Texas Biomedical Analysis Institute in San Antonio, say that the concept of reducing one area to learn one other creates a false dichotomy between persistent and infectious illness that isn’t rooted in scientific actuality.
For instance of how tightly the 2 are linked, researchers cite growing proof that some persistent circumstances stem from infectious illnesses: an infection with human papillomavirus (HPV), for example, may cause most cancers of the cervix and different tissues. “Prioritizing persistent circumstances more and more means prioritizing infectious illnesses,” says Schlesinger, who was himself identified with oral most cancers after an an infection with HPV a long time earlier than. “We’re appreciating increasingly more that infections, and the irritation they trigger, play an necessary function in these persistent circumstances.”
Scientists additionally say that the continuing outbreak of chook flu, which has made no less than 68 individuals in the US ailing because the begin of 2024, makes this an particularly dangerous time to chop analysis into infectious illnesses.
Give attention to meals
As a part of his ‘Make America Wholesome Once more’ pledge, Kennedy has repeatedly known as for additional research into weight loss program and vitamin, in addition to analysis on the hyperlinks between environmental air pollution and human well being. Throughout his January listening to, Kennedy mentioned that scientists “know” that weight problems is brought on by “an environmental toxin”, and requested why researchers haven’t devoted themselves to discovering and eliminating it.
Fatima Cody Stanford, a physician-scientist at Harvard Medical Faculty in Boston, Massachusetts, who research weight problems medication, notes that weight problems is a fancy situation pushed not solely by the atmosphere, but additionally by genetics, growth and behavior. “RFK’s assertion displays restricted data of that complexity,” she says.
A stronger deal with meals techniques and weight loss program may nonetheless be a welcome change, says Deirdre Tobias, an epidemiologist at Brigham and Ladies’s Hospital in Boston. Previous administrations, she notes, have largely uncared for “the ‘F’ in FDA”. However modifications to meals coverage have to be rigorously thought of and backed by sound science, she says, as a result of the fallacious coverage selections may cause hurt.
For instance, Kennedy has advocated eliminating ultra-processed meals. However this class incorporates wildly completely different sorts of meals, and researchers don’t but know which facets of them is likely to be dangerous, says Tobias. “There could possibly be quite a bit performed with the proper steps,” she says, however the authorities shouldn’t be “taking sledgehammers to issues which can be damaged with out understanding the ramifications”.
Cash woes
No matter Kennedy’s priorities, it appears clear that the whole funding out there for biomedical analysis shall be lower than it has been in earlier years. Trump’s shut advisor Elon Musk has pledged to chop the federal finances by no less than $2 trillion. On 7 February, the administration introduced that it will slash a type of analysis funding known as indirect-cost funds, sparking panic within the educational group. A federal choose has briefly suspended the coverage, which the NIH mentioned would save greater than $4 billion per yr.
Francisco Diez-Gonzalez, a food-safety microbiologist on the College of Georgia in Griffin, says that greater than something, “it’s the discount of funding that’s going to be the main influence” of Kennedy’s tenure.
Kennedy has mentioned he’ll re-examine the change to oblique prices, however researchers are apprehensive about his subsequent strikes. Kennedy “doesn’t have a observe file of scientific inquiry”, says Cody Stanford. “It’s laborious to know what he would do.”
This text is reproduced with permission and was first revealed on February 13, 2025.
